Comments on Nerdblog.com: Vista build 5536 is lots better

Thanks for the numbers! I hadn't actually measured...

2006-09-27T12:31:00.000-07:00

Thanks for the numbers! I hadn't actually measured on the same hardware when I posted (Vista just looked sane), so it's good to have an actual A-B comparison.

I finally got around to installing Vista... For ra...

2006-09-22T05:25:00.000-07:00

I finally got around to installing Vista... For random information (since I asked, might as well answer) here are my results on Vista vs XP.

P4 3.4ghz, Radeon X800 pro

-Vista RC1 (Build 5600)-

BitBlt:
avg: 610.9 fps [715.9 MB/sec]
max: 837.5 fps [981.5 MB/sec]
min: 86.4 fps [101.3 MB/sec]

ReverseBlt:
avg: 656.0 fps [768.7 MB/sec]
max: 812.6 fps [952.3 MB/sec]
min: 472.2 fps [553.3 MB/seC]

-xp sp2-

BitBlt:
avg: 728.2 fps [853.4 MB/sec]
max: 916.1 fps [1073.6 MB/sec]
min: 85.4 fps [100.1 MB/sec]

ReverseBlt:
avg: 115.3 fps [135.2 MB/sec]
max: 117.3 fps [137.5 MB/sec]
min: 114.5 fps [134.2 MB/sec]

2006-09-22T05:18:00.000-07:00

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

It's good to know Vista perf has gotten better. W...

2006-09-07T05:49:00.000-07:00

It's good to know Vista perf has gotten better. When you say, "within shouting distance", how close to xp's perf is that? Some people can shout pretty loud... Do you have numbers?

Thanks.