tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6275903.post2540416888263311709..comments2007-03-06T03:06:02.309-08:00Michaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00058296587455402398noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6275903.post-73231720153658797122007-03-06T03:06:00.000-08:002007-03-06T03:06:00.000-08:002007-03-06T03:06:00.000-08:00The claim is that their impressive decompression speed makes the worse quality okay. But ho hum, really.Michaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00058296587455402398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6275903.post-43567744307455025332007-02-19T21:45:00.000-08:002007-02-19T21:45:00.000-08:002007-02-19T21:45:00.000-08:00That's good news, though I'm still fuzzy on the "why"... have you seen this comparison (by way of example) <A HREF="http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/wmp_codecs_comparison_en.html" REL="nofollow"> http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/wmp_codecs_comparison_en.html</A>?Sree Kotayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01637645734999157782noreply@blogger.com